On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:28:07AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE is equivalent to MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT. > > The flag is propagated as follows: > renesas_sdhi_of_data::capabilities2 > -> tmio_mmc_data::capabilities2 > -> mmc_host::caps2 > > Only the difference is the TMIO_... makes tmio_mmc_get_ro() return 0 > (i.e. it does not affect mmc_gpio_get_ro() at all), while MMC_CAP2_... > returns 0 before calling ->get_ro() hook (i.e. it affects both IP own > logic and GPIO detection). > > The TMIO MMC drivers do not set-up gpio_ro by themselves. Only the > possibility, if any, would be DT specifies "wp-gpios" property, and > gpio_ro is set by mmc_gpiod_request_ro() called from mmc_of_parse(). > However, it does not make sense to specify "wp-gpios" property and > TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE at the same time. > > I checked under arch/arm/boot/dts/ and arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/, > and I did not see any Renesas boards with "wp-gpios". So, this > conversion should be safe. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
