Hi Niklas,

Thank you for the patch.

On Monday, 29 January 2018 18:34:29 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Each Gen3 SoC has a limited set of predefined routing possibilities for
> which CSI-2 device and virtual channel can be routed to which VIN
> instance. Prepare to store this information in the struct rvin_info.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h
> b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h index
> 903d8fb8426a7860..ca2c2a23cef8506c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-vin.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,14 @@ enum model_id {
>       RCAR_GEN3,
>  };
> 
> +enum rvin_csi_id {
> +     RVIN_CSI20,
> +     RVIN_CSI21,
> +     RVIN_CSI40,
> +     RVIN_CSI41,
> +     RVIN_CSI_MAX,
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * STOPPED  - No operation in progress
>   * RUNNING  - Operation in progress have buffers
> @@ -81,12 +89,33 @@ struct rvin_graph_entity {
>       unsigned int sink_pad;
>  };
> 
> +/** struct rvin_group_route - Map a CSI-2 receiver and channel to a CHSEL

If my understanding is correct an entry describes a route from a channel of a 
CSI-2 receiver to a VIN, and how to configure the hardware to enable that 
route (in the mask field). Could you expand this single line of documentation 
to explain that more clearly ?

> + * @vin:             Which VIN the CSI-2 and VC describes

VC ? Is that virtual channel ? Isn't that internal to the CSI-2 receiver only 
?

> + * @csi:             VIN internal number for CSI-2 device

Or just "CSI-2 receiver ID" ?

> + * @chan:            Output channel of the CSI-2 receiver. Each R-Car CSI-2

Would "channel" be too long ?

> + *                   receiver has four output channels facing the VIN
> + *                   devices, each channel can carry one CSI-2 Virtual
> + *                   Channel (VC) and there are no correlation between
> + *                   output channel number and CSI-2 VC. It's up to the
> + *                   CSI-2 receiver driver to configure which VC is
> + *                   outputted on which channel, the VIN devices only

s/outputted/output/

> + *                   cares about output channels.

s/cares/care/

> + * @mask:            Bitmask of chsel values which accommodates route

s/which/that/

Reading the documentation I'm not sure to understand how this works. In 
particular the mask field documentation isn't clear enough.

> + */
> +struct rvin_group_route {
> +     unsigned int vin;
> +     enum rvin_csi_id csi;
> +     unsigned char chan;

You can make this an unsigned int, the compiler will pad the field anyway.

I think it would be clearer to order the fields in "from -> to: configuration" 
order (csi, channel, vin, mask).

> +     unsigned int mask;
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * struct rvin_info - Information about the particular VIN implementation
>   * @model:           VIN model
>   * @use_mc:          use media controller instead of controlling subdevice
>   * @max_width:               max input width the VIN supports
>   * @max_height:              max input height the VIN supports
> + * @routes:          routing table VIN <-> CSI-2 for the chsel values
>   */
>  struct rvin_info {
>       enum model_id model;
> @@ -94,6 +123,7 @@ struct rvin_info {
> 
>       unsigned int max_width;
>       unsigned int max_height;
> +     const struct rvin_group_route *routes;
>  };
> 
>  /**

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Reply via email to