From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 20:28:16 +0300
> The TSU_QTAG0/1 registers found in the Gigabit Ether controllers actually
> have the same long name as the TSU_QTAGM0/1 registers in the early Ether
> controllers: Qtag Addition/Deletion Set Register (Port 0/1 to 1/0); thus
> there's no need to make a difference in sh_eth_tsu_init() between those
> controllers. Unfortunately, we can't just remove TSU_QTAG0/1 from the
> register *enum* because that would break the ethtool register dump...
>
> Fixes: b0ca2a21f769 ("sh_eth: Add support of SH7763 to sh_eth")
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com>
Applied.
