On 21.03.2018 09:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Use enum dma_transfer_direction as required by dmaengine_prep_slave_sg()
> instead of enum dma_data_direction.  This won't change behavior in
> practice as the enum values are equivalent.
> 
> This fixes two warnings when building with clang:
>   drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c:755:27: warning: implicit conversion from
> enumeration
>       type 'enum dma_data_direction' to different enumeration type
>       'enum dma_transfer_direction' [-Wenum-conversion]
>                                       rx->sgl, rx->nents, DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
>                                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c:772:27: warning: implicit conversion from
> enumeration
>       type 'enum dma_data_direction' to different enumeration type
>       'enum dma_transfer_direction' [-Wenum-conversion]
>                                       tx->sgl, tx->nents, DMA_TO_DEVICE,
>                                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Based on commit 768d59f5d0139a6f ("spi: rspi: use correct enum for DMA
> transfer direction").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>

Looks good to me!

Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch>

--
Stefan

> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c
> index c5dcfb434a498b27..ae086aab57d51edc 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c
> @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ static int sh_msiof_dma_once(struct
> sh_msiof_spi_priv *p, const void *tx,
>       if (rx) {
>               ier_bits |= IER_RDREQE | IER_RDMAE;
>               desc_rx = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(p->master->dma_rx,
> -                                     p->rx_dma_addr, len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
> +                                     p->rx_dma_addr, len, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
>                                       DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT | DMA_CTRL_ACK);
>               if (!desc_rx)
>                       return -EAGAIN;
> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static int sh_msiof_dma_once(struct
> sh_msiof_spi_priv *p, const void *tx,
>               dma_sync_single_for_device(p->master->dma_tx->device->dev,
>                                          p->tx_dma_addr, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>               desc_tx = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(p->master->dma_tx,
> -                                     p->tx_dma_addr, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE,
> +                                     p->tx_dma_addr, len, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV,
>                                       DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT | DMA_CTRL_ACK);
>               if (!desc_tx) {
>                       ret = -EAGAIN;

Reply via email to