Hi Eric,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Auger Eric <eric.au...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/02/18 16:17, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Allow the instantation of generic dynamic sysbus devices again, without
>> the need to create a new device-specific vfio type.
>>
>> This is a partial revert of commit 6f2062b9758ebc64 ("hw/arm/virt:
>> Allow only supported dynamic sysbus devices").
>>
>> Not-Yet-Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
>> ---
>> hw/arm/virt.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> index b334c82edae9fb1f..fa83784fc08ed076 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> @@ -1596,6 +1596,7 @@ static void virt_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc,
>> void *data)
>> mc->max_cpus = 255;
>> machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(mc, TYPE_VFIO_CALXEDA_XGMAC);
>> machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(mc, TYPE_VFIO_AMD_XGBE);
>> + machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(mc, TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE);
> Couldn't you limit that to TYPE_VFIO_PLATFORM instead?
Yep, that works. Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
