Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2018, 16:06:19 CEST schrieb Wolfram Sang:
> We should get drvdata from struct device directly. Going via
> platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com>

Acked-by: Marc Dietrich <marvi...@gmx.de>

> ---
> 
> Build tested only. buildbot is happy. Please apply individually.
> 
>  drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> index 52054a528723..2a5e0dcf4162 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> @@ -925,8 +925,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev) static int nvec_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>       int err;
> -     struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> -     struct nvec_chip *nvec = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +     struct nvec_chip *nvec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>       struct nvec_msg *msg;
>       char ap_suspend[] = { NVEC_SLEEP, AP_SUSPEND };
> 
> @@ -946,8 +945,7 @@ static int nvec_suspend(struct device *dev)
> 
>  static int nvec_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -     struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> -     struct nvec_chip *nvec = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +     struct nvec_chip *nvec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> 
>       dev_dbg(nvec->dev, "resuming\n");
>       tegra_init_i2c_slave(nvec);




Reply via email to