On 2018-05-20 08:45, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 11:40:04PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-04-30 13:55, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>> Due to a typo, the wrong parent device was assigned to the newly created >>> demuxing adapter device. It got connected to the demuxing platform >>> device but not to the selected parent I2C adapter device. Fix it to get >>> a proper parent-child relationship of the demuxed busses, needed also for >>> proper PM. >>> >> >> Should this one have a Fixes: tag? Should it go to current or next? Is >> a backport to stable good enough? > > A Fixes tag is probably apropriate. I don't think it should go to > stable, though, because it will break a scheme a user might be using. > This can't be avoided for a kernel upgrade here, but IMO we shouldn't > enforce it for a stable update. Especially, given this is not a real > bug, but more something improper. For the same reason, I'd think -next > is good enough. > > Thanks, will resend!
Hmm, in that case, I think a Fixes tag is best left out, because I suspect the net effect is mostly a bunch of mails from the stable trees as the automatic patch-picker finds this patch. So, I plan to go with this patch. Ok? Cheers, Peter
