On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:24:37AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > All source files of the vsp1 driver are licensed under the GPLv2+ except > for vsp1_regs.h which is licensed under GPLv2. This is caused by a bad > copy&paste that dates back from the initial version of the driver. Fix > it. > > Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu...@renesas.com> > Acked-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+rene...@ideasonboard.com> > Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov<sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com> > Acked-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se> > Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com> > --- > Iwamatsu-san, > > While working on the VSP1 driver I noticed that all source files are > licensed under the GPLv2+ except for vsp1_regs.h which is licensed under > GPLv2. I'd like to fix this inconsistency. As you have contributed to > that file, could you please provide your explicit ack if you agree to > this change ? > --- > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h > b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h > index 0d249ff9f564..e82661216c1d 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
While you are changing this line, I believe the correct format is to use a '//' comment. i.e.: // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > /* > * vsp1_regs.h -- R-Car VSP1 Registers Definitions > * > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart >
