On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:45:17PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The naming of the "b" versions of the VIN1 pin groups is a bit odd, in
> that the "_b" appears in the middle of the names, instead of as a
> suffix.
>
> Increase consistency with other SoCs by making R-Car M2-W and M2-N, and
> RZ/G1M and RZ/G1N, use the recently added optional "version" argument of
> the VIN_DATA_PIN_GROUP() macro.
>
> Note that this breaks backwards compatibility with existing DTBs, but
> there are no upstream users of the "vin1_b_*" names.
>
> Fixes: 8e32c9671f84acd8 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7791: Add VIN pins")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> ---
> Is it worth making this change?
> If yes, should we retain backwards-compatibility using e.g. the patch
> below, increasing kernel size by 380 bytes?
>
> Note that unlike the deprecated "avb_mdc" pin groups on R-Car Gen3, the
> "vin1_b_*" groups never had upstream users, so I'm inclined not to care
> about backwards compatibility.
That sounds fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
