Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>
> This patch adds common code to enable support of gpio interrupts on s5p
> series.
>
> The total number of gpio pins is quite large on s5p series. Registering
> irq support for all of them would be a resource waste. Because of that
> the interrupt support for standard gpio pins is registered dynamically
> by the s5p_register_gpio_interrupt() function.
Hi,
I checked only S5PV210/S5PC110 GPIO interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.s...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig | 5 +
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/irqs.h | 5 +
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c | 243
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h | 18 ++
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-core.h | 4 +
> 6 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig
> index 407e323..d77d518 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig
> @@ -32,6 +32,11 @@ config S5P_EXT_INT
> Use the external interrupts (other than GPIO interrupts.)
> Note: Do not choose this for S5P6440.
>
> +config S5P_GPIO_INT
> + bool
> + help
> + Common code for the GPIO interrupts (other than external
interrupts.)
> +
> config S5P_DEV_FIMC0
> bool
> help
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile
> index f3e917e..e0823be 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-y += cpu.o
> obj-y += clock.o
> obj-y += irq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_S5P_EXT_INT) += irq-eint.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_S5P_GPIO_INT) += irq-gpioint.o
>
> # devices
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/irqs.h b/arch/arm/plat-
> s5p/include/plat/irqs.h
> index 3fb3a3a..50bcf1e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/irqs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/irqs.h
> @@ -94,4 +94,9 @@
> ((irq) - S5P_EINT_BASE1) : \
> ((irq) + 16 -
> S5P_EINT_BASE2))
>
> +/* GPIO interrupt (registered by s5p_register_gpio_interrupt) */
> +#define S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_COUNT 4
> +#define S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_SIZE 8
Is it possible to support S5P SoCs GPIO interrupt with only 4-GROUPs?
> +#define S5P_GPIOINT_COUNT (S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_COUNT *
> S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_SIZE)
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_PLAT_S5P_IRQS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c
b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7409ae0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
> +/* linux/arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * Author: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
> + * Author: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.s...@samsung.com>
> + * Author: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the
> + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at
your
> + * option) any later version.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +
> +#include <mach/map.h>
> +#include <plat/gpio-core.h>
> +#include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
> +
> +#define S5P_GPIOREG(x) (S5P_VA_GPIO + (x))
> +
> +#define GPIOINT_CON_OFFSET 0x700
> +#define GPIOINT_MASK_OFFSET 0x900
> +#define GPIOINT_PEND_OFFSET 0xA00
> +
> +#define GPIOINT_LEVEL_LOW 0x0
> +#define GPIOINT_LEVEL_HIGH 0x1
> +#define GPIOINT_EDGE_FALLING 0x2
> +#define GPIOINT_EDGE_RISING 0x3
> +#define GPIOINT_EDGE_BOTH 0x4
I remember Kyungmin's patch about interrupt polarity of GPIO Interrupt and
GPIO External Interrupt.
How about merging them into plat-s5p/include
Hmm...let's think the proper name...
> +
> +static struct s3c_gpio_chip *irq_chips[S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_MAXNR];
Where is the definition of S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_MAXNR?
> +
> +static int s5p_gpioint_get_group(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *chip = get_irq_data(irq);
> + struct s3c_gpio_chip *s3c_chip = container_of(chip,
> + struct s3c_gpio_chip, chip);
> + int group;
> +
> + for (group = 0; group < S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_MAXNR; group++)
> + if (s3c_chip == irq_chips[group])
> + break;
> +
> + return group;
> +}
> +
> +static int s5p_gpioint_get_offset(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *chip = get_irq_data(irq);
> + struct s3c_gpio_chip *s3c_chip = container_of(chip,
> + struct s3c_gpio_chip, chip);
> +
> + return irq - s3c_chip->irq_base;
> +}
> +
> +static void s5p_gpioint_ack(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + int group, offset, pend_offset;
> + unsigned int value;
> +
> + group = s5p_gpioint_get_group(irq);
> + offset = s5p_gpioint_get_offset(irq);
> + pend_offset = group << 2;
> +
> + value = __raw_readl(S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_PEND_OFFSET) +
> pend_offset);
> + value |= 1 << offset;
> + __raw_writel(value, S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_PEND_OFFSET) +
> pend_offset);
> +}
> +
> +static void s5p_gpioint_mask(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + int group, offset, mask_offset;
> + unsigned int value;
> +
> + group = s5p_gpioint_get_group(irq);
> + offset = s5p_gpioint_get_offset(irq);
> + mask_offset = group << 2;
> +
> + value = __raw_readl(S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_MASK_OFFSET) +
> mask_offset);
> + value |= 1 << offset;
> + __raw_writel(value, S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_MASK_OFFSET) +
> mask_offset);
> +}
> +
> +static void s5p_gpioint_unmask(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + int group, offset, mask_offset;
> + unsigned int value;
> +
> + group = s5p_gpioint_get_group(irq);
> + offset = s5p_gpioint_get_offset(irq);
> + mask_offset = group << 2;
> +
> + value = __raw_readl(S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_MASK_OFFSET) +
> mask_offset);
> + value &= ~(1 << offset);
> + __raw_writel(value, S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_MASK_OFFSET) +
> mask_offset);
> +}
> +
> +static void s5p_gpioint_mask_ack(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + s5p_gpioint_mask(irq);
> + s5p_gpioint_ack(irq);
> +}
> +
> +static int s5p_gpioint_set_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
> +{
> + int group, offset, con_offset;
> + unsigned int value;
> +
> + group = s5p_gpioint_get_group(irq);
> + offset = s5p_gpioint_get_offset(irq);
> + con_offset = group << 2;
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case IRQ_TYPE_NONE:
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "No irq type\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> + type = GPIOINT_EDGE_RISING;
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> + type = GPIOINT_EDGE_FALLING;
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
> + type = GPIOINT_EDGE_BOTH;
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> + type = GPIOINT_LEVEL_HIGH;
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> + type = GPIOINT_LEVEL_LOW;
> + break;
> + default:
> + BUG();
how about merging IRQ_TYPE_NONE and 'default'?
And basically, rerely happened exception case, so it's better move
IRQ_TYPE_NONE to later in switch case.
> + }
> +
> + value = __raw_readl(S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_CON_OFFSET) +
> con_offset);
> + value &= ~(0xf << (offset * 0x4));
0x7 is enough on S5PV210...but need to check another S5P SoCs.
> + value |= (type << (offset * 0x4));
> + __raw_writel(value, S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_CON_OFFSET) +
> con_offset);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct irq_chip s5p_gpioint = {
> + .name = "GPIO",
how about s5p-gpioint?
> + .ack = s5p_gpioint_ack,
> + .mask = s5p_gpioint_mask,
> + .mask_ack = s5p_gpioint_mask_ack,
> + .unmask = s5p_gpioint_unmask,
> + .set_type = s5p_gpioint_set_type,
> +};
> +
> +static void s5p_gpioint_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + int group, offset, pend_offset, mask_offset;
> + int real_irq;
> + unsigned int pend, mask;
> +
> + for (group = 0; group < S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_MAXNR; group++) {
> + pend_offset = group << 2;
> + pend = __raw_readl(S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_PEND_OFFSET) +
> + pend_offset);
> + if (!pend)
> + continue;
> +
> + mask_offset = group << 2;
> + mask = __raw_readl(S5P_GPIOREG(GPIOINT_MASK_OFFSET) +
> + mask_offset);
> + pend &= ~mask;
> +
> + for (offset = 0; offset < 8; offset++) {
> + if (pend & (1 << offset)) {
> + struct s3c_gpio_chip *chip =
irq_chips[group];
> + if (chip) {
> + real_irq = chip->irq_base + offset;
> + generic_handle_irq(real_irq);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static __init int s5p_gpioint_add(struct s3c_gpio_chip *chip)
> +{
> + static int used_gpioint_groups = 0;
> + static bool handler_registered = 0;
> + int irq, group = chip->group;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (used_gpioint_groups >= S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_COUNT)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + chip->irq_base = S5P_GPIOINT_BASE +
> + used_gpioint_groups * S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_SIZE;
Where is S5P_GPIOINT_BASE?
> + used_gpioint_groups++;
> +
> + if (!handler_registered) {
> + set_irq_chained_handler(IRQ_GPIOINT, s5p_gpioint_handler);
As you know, IRQ_GPIOINT defined only in the mach-s5p6442, mach-s5pc100 and
mach-s5pv210.
It means can be happend build error with mach-s5p64x0 or mach-s5pv310.
> + handler_registered = 1;
> + }
> +
> + irq_chips[group] = chip;
> + for (i = 0; i < chip->chip.ngpio; i++) {
> + irq = chip->irq_base + i;
> + set_irq_chip(irq, &s5p_gpioint);
> + set_irq_data(irq, &chip->chip);
Do we really need set_irq_data?
> + set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
> + set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __init s5p_register_gpio_interrupt(int pin)
> +{
> + struct s3c_gpio_chip *my_chip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(pin);
> + int offset, group;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!my_chip)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + offset = pin - my_chip->chip.base;
> + group = my_chip->group;
> +
> + /* check if the group has been already registered */
> + if (my_chip->irq_base)
> + return my_chip->irq_base + offset;
> +
> + /* register gpio group */
> + ret = s5p_gpioint_add(my_chip);
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Registered interrupt support for gpio
> group %d.\n",
> + group);
> + return my_chip->irq_base + offset;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h
b/arch/arm/plat-
> samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h
> index db4112c..41479a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h
> @@ -169,4 +169,22 @@ extern s5p_gpio_drvstr_t s5p_gpio_get_drvstr(unsigned
> int pin);
> */
> extern int s5p_gpio_set_drvstr(unsigned int pin, s5p_gpio_drvstr_t
drvstr);
>
> +/**
> + * s5p_register_gpio_interrupt() - register interrupt support for a gpio
group
> + * @pin: The pin number from the group to be registered
> + *
> + * This function registers gpio interrupt support for the group that the
> + * specified pin belongs to.
> + *
> + * The total number of gpio pins is quite large ob s5p series.
Registering
> + * irq support for all of them would be a resource waste. Because of that
the
> + * interrupt support for standard gpio pins is registered dynamically.
> + *
> + * It will return the irq number of the interrupt that has been
registered
> + * or -ENOMEM if no more gpio interrupts can be registered. It is allowed
> + * to call this function more than once for the same gpio group (the
group
> + * will be registered only once).
> + */
> +extern int s5p_register_gpio_interrupt(int pin);
> +
> #endif /* __PLAT_GPIO_CFG_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-core.h
b/arch/arm/plat-
> samsung/include/plat/gpio-core.h
> index e358c7d..c22c27c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-core.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-core.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ struct s3c_gpio_cfg;
> * struct s3c_gpio_chip - wrapper for specific implementation of gpio
> * @chip: The chip structure to be exported via gpiolib.
> * @base: The base pointer to the gpio configuration registers.
> + * @group: The group register number for gpio interrupt support.
> + * @irq_base: The base irq number.
> * @config: special function and pull-resistor control information.
> * @lock: Lock for exclusive access to this gpio bank.
> * @pm_save: Save information for suspend/resume support.
> @@ -63,6 +65,8 @@ struct s3c_gpio_chip {
> struct s3c_gpio_cfg *config;
> struct s3c_gpio_pm *pm;
> void __iomem *base;
> + int irq_base;
> + int group;
> spinlock_t lock;
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> u32 pm_save[4];
> --
I need sleeping :-)
Will continue tomorrow.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
