Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 17:03 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: > > On 14 September 2011 16:47, Vinod Koul <vinod.k...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > >> The changelog for [PATCH v8 04/16] is misleading - we don't need any > > >> modification for the reason mentioned in changelog. But the modification > > >> has positive side-effect of preventing callbacks during terminate_all > > >> which > > >> is no way understood from the changelog. So I would like to changelog > > >> corrected. > > > I thought change log was correct in depicting what patch does and Boojin > > > had replied.... I will check again... > > > > I didn't reply because I ran out of ways to explain the same thing in > > different words. > I checked again the patch, change log and your comments. > I agree with current change log, and also your observation is right but > that is just a side effect, which IMO should be best left to developer > to choose or not, in this case she ignored it > > So no changes to this and I a ready to merge it to my next in a day or > two... > So as a note, pulled git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git samsung_dma for other regarding dma patches in arch/arm/ samsung stuff.
If any problems, please let me know. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
