> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com] > Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:58 AM > To: Kukjin Kim > Cc: 'Jingoo Han'; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- > u...@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gre...@suse.de; > st...@rowland.harvard.edu; 'Yulgon Kim'; 'Shim Joonyoung' > Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:10:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com] > > > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM > > > > > To: Jingoo Han > > > > > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- > u...@vger.kernel.org; > > > > > linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gre...@suse.de; > > > > > st...@rowland.harvard.edu; kgene....@samsung.com; > > > yulgon....@samsung.com; > > > > > jy0922.s...@samsung.com > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and > driver > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote: > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for > > > Samsung > > > > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on > SMDKV310 > > > > > board > > > > > > using EXYNOS4. > > > > > > > > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right? > > > > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree. > > > > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree. > > > > Thanks. > > > > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device > > > > [PATCH 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board > > > > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation... > > > > Anyway, > > > > > So the third patch does not depend on the first two? If it does, that > > > means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch, > > > right? > > > > > > If so, then all three should go through a single tree. > > > > > Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can > avoid > > useless conflicts. > > > > I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his > > updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree > > with my ack? > > The samsung tree is fine to take these, thanks. > Hi Greg,
OK, let me pick this up in my tree...so, when I apply, may I can have a ack from you on 3rd patch? Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
