On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:13:54PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That sounds like it'd be helpful overall but it's something that has to > > be sorted out at the maintainer level. I'm guessing there's not really > > much that contributors can do here? > I think you did everything as good as you could, we just need to routinely > call for everyone to submit stuff in time. A number of maintainers sent stuff > after Christmas (which I expected to start the merge window) and were mostly > lucky because Linus gave us an extra 10 days to sort things out. I guess it would also be useful to have some way to compare what's in -next with what's in the arm-soc tree and chase people if that diff gets big. I do also wonder if it's worth letting people push stuff to you more aggressively - right now you seem to be asking people to batch things up and I wonder if that's making it a it easier for things to end up dropping on the floor if a time based routine isn't working well for people. > end, samsung also did for the most part but not entirely and you were > unfortunate to be the contributor of the patches that missed out. It's not just me, I'm just vocal and perhaps more to the point spend a reasonable amount of time chasing stuff into various trees so want to figure out if I need to change what I'm doing with that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
