Olof Johansson wrote: [...] > Looks like the breakage was caused by the following commit: > > commit 1974a042dd15f1f007a3a1a2dd7a23ca0e42c01d > Author: Padmavathi Venna <padm...@samsung.com> > AuthorDate: Wed Nov 28 16:17:48 2012 +0530 > Commit: Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> > CommitDate: Wed Nov 28 19:18:00 2012 +0000 > > ASoC: Samsung: Get I2S src_clk from clock alias id. > > Padmavathi, you can't send out code that breaks all Samsung platforms > like this, even if there are patches out there that fixes it. Changes > have to be bisectable, which means that you can't break and unbreak > the build, least of all if you merge through different maintainers. > And you need to tell the other maintainer that there are dependent > patches, you just sent the above patch to Mark without any such > information. > Oops, I thought the 'src_clk' should be restored with my drop the commit 48a2050d ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Delete the unnecessary variable"), however, seems other patch has same changes...What's happening?
See below, http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-November/134979.h tml > Kukjin, I see that Padmavathi has posted a V3 series of patches to > remove all this from the dev-audio files on November 23. Are you ok > with us picking them up and sending ASAP? > Hmm, just Mark's following can fix it but I didn't look at it yet. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-November/134911.h tml - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html