On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > Hmm, it turns out we are still actively using some boards based on > Exynos4210 EVT0 SoCs. And since it seems unlikely the patches from > Tomasz [1] adding basic DT support for those will get merged for > 3.10, it would be a bit inconvenient to remove the ATAGS support > now, leaving Exynos4210 Rev. 0 not supported at all.
I still have hope to get those included. > Not sure what's others opinion on that, and what would be an advantage > of removing non-dt support for Exynos now, rather than in 3.11, vs. any > possible inconvenience and regressions this could cause. A multiplatform kernel will not work on an ATAGS based Exynos platform, but I think we can have it both ways and allow either multiplatform DT-only or single-platform with both DT and ATAGS in 3.10. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html