Vikas and Yadwinder,

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Vikas Sajjan <vikas.saj...@linaro.org> wrote:
> +static long samsung_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +                       unsigned long drate, unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> +       struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
> +       const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate_table = pll->rate_table;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       /* Assumming rate_table is in descending order */
> +       for (i = 0; i < pll->rate_count; i++) {
> +               if (drate >= rate_table[i].rate)
> +                       return rate_table[i].rate;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* return minimum supported value */
> +       return rate_table[i - 1].rate;
> +}
>  /*
>   * PLL35xx Clock Type
>   */

You seem to have lost a carriage return between v2 and v3.  I will add
it locally before applying.  This still looks good though and already
has my Reviewed-by.

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to