On 08/19/2013 11:25 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 08/19/2013 03:25 PM, Pawel Moll wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 14:18 +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-s5k5baf.txt >>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ >>> +Samsung S5K5BAF UXGA 1/5" 2M CMOS Image Sensor with embedded SoC ISP >>> +------------------------------------------------------------- >>> + >>> +Required properties: >>> + >>> +- compatible : "samsung,s5k5baf"; >>> +- reg : I2C slave address of the sensor; >>> +- vdda-supply : analog power supply 2.8V (2.6V to 3.0V); >>> +- vddreg-supply : regulator input power supply 1.8V (1.7V to 1.9V) >>> + or 2.8V (2.6V to 3.0); >>> +- vddio-supply : I/O power supply 1.8V (1.65V to 1.95V) >>> + or 2.8V (2.5V to 3.1V); >>> +- gpios : GPIOs connected to STDBYN and RSTN pins, >>> + in order: STBYN, RSTN; >> >> You probably want to use the "[<name>-]gpios" convention here (see >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt), so something like >> stbyn-gpios and rstn-gpios. > > Unless using multiple named properties is really preferred over a single > "gpios" property I would like to keep the single property containing > a list of GPIOs. ...
Yes, a separate property for each type of GPIO is typical. Multiple entries in the same property are allowed if they're used for the same purpose/type, whereas here they're clearly different things. Inconsistent with (some) other properties, admittedly... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
