On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field needs
> to be initialized explicitly.
> static void __init smdkv210_map_io(void)
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static struct samsung_bl_drvdata samsung_dfl_bl_data
> __initdata = {
> .max_brightness = 255,
> .dft_brightness = 255,
> .pwm_period_ns = 78770,
> + .enable_gpio = -1,
> .init = samsung_bl_init,
> .exit = samsung_bl_exit,
> },
> @@ -121,6 +122,10 @@ void __init samsung_bl_set(struct samsung_bl_gpio_info
> *gpio_info,
> samsung_bl_data->lth_brightness = bl_data->lth_brightness;
> if (bl_data->pwm_period_ns)
> samsung_bl_data->pwm_period_ns = bl_data->pwm_period_ns;
> + if (bl_data->enable_gpio)
> + samsung_bl_data->enable_gpio = bl_data->enable_gpio;
> + if (bl_data->enable_gpio_flags)
> + samsung_bl_data->enable_gpio_flags = bl_data->enable_gpio_flags;
Won't this cause the core pwm_bl driver to request/manipulate the GPIO,
whereas this driver already does that inside the samsung_bl_init/exit
callbacks? I think you either need to adjust those callbacks, or not set
the new standard GPIO property in samsung_bl_data.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
