On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > The GPIO API defines 0 as being a valid GPIO number, so this field needs > to be initialized explicitly.
> static void __init smdkv210_map_io(void) > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static struct samsung_bl_drvdata samsung_dfl_bl_data > __initdata = { > .max_brightness = 255, > .dft_brightness = 255, > .pwm_period_ns = 78770, > + .enable_gpio = -1, > .init = samsung_bl_init, > .exit = samsung_bl_exit, > }, > @@ -121,6 +122,10 @@ void __init samsung_bl_set(struct samsung_bl_gpio_info > *gpio_info, > samsung_bl_data->lth_brightness = bl_data->lth_brightness; > if (bl_data->pwm_period_ns) > samsung_bl_data->pwm_period_ns = bl_data->pwm_period_ns; > + if (bl_data->enable_gpio) > + samsung_bl_data->enable_gpio = bl_data->enable_gpio; > + if (bl_data->enable_gpio_flags) > + samsung_bl_data->enable_gpio_flags = bl_data->enable_gpio_flags; Won't this cause the core pwm_bl driver to request/manipulate the GPIO, whereas this driver already does that inside the samsung_bl_init/exit callbacks? I think you either need to adjust those callbacks, or not set the new standard GPIO property in samsung_bl_data. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html