Hi,

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmp...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
> <ch.nav...@samsung.com> wrote:
>> For Exynos4 and Exynos5 SoCs from Samsung the i2c clock is based
>> on a fixed 66 MHz peripheral clock, and therefore is completely
>> independent of the cpu frequency.
>> Thus, registering for a CPU freq notifier is very wasteful.
>>
>> This patch modifes the code such that, i2c bus registers to
>> cpu_freq_transition only if CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX is enabled.
>>
>> This change should save a bunch of cpufreq transitions calls
>> which does not apply to exynos SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.nav...@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> Use CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX instead of (CONFIG_CPU_FREQ & !CONFIG_EXYNOS)
>> As commented by Tomasz
>>
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Looks great to me.  Thank you for the suggestions Tomasz, as always.

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>

We need to come up with a solution for the CPU_FREQ stuff in
s3c2410_wdt too.  We could use a similar solution but since the
CPU_FREQ stuff in s3c2410_wdt is more than just an optimization it
means that it's not good if S3C24XX is included in a multiplatform
kernel.  (For the watchdog it's more than just an optimization since
every frequency transition actually pets the watchdog, making it
useless when you transition several times per second).

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to