Hi Tomek,

On Monday, March 03, 2014 05:02:08 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This patch moves Exynos power domain code to use the new generic power
> domain look-up framework introduced by previous patch, allowing the new
> code to be compiled with CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS selected as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.f...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt           | 12 ++--
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c                  | 80 
> +---------------------
>  kernel/power/Kconfig                               |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
> index 5216b41..60f26a8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ Required Properties:
>      * samsung,exynos4210-pd - for exynos4210 type power domain.
>  - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
>      region.
> +- #power-domain-cells: number of cells in power domain specifier;
> +    must be 0.
>  
>  Node of a device using power domains must have a samsung,power-domain 
> property
>  defined with a phandle to respective power domain.
> @@ -17,12 +19,8 @@ Example:
>       lcd0: power-domain-lcd0 {
>               compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd";
>               reg = <0x10023C00 0x10>;
> +             #power-domain-cells = <0>;
>       };
>  
> -Example of the node using power domain:
> -
> -     node {
> -             /* ... */
> -             samsung,power-domain = <&lcd0>;
> -             /* ... */
> -     };
> +See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt for description
> +of consumer-side bindings.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c
> index 8fd2488..48ee6c9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c
> @@ -75,78 +75,6 @@ static int exynos_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain 
> *domain)
>       return exynos_pd_power(domain, false);
>  }
>  
> -static void exynos_add_device_to_domain(struct exynos_pm_domain *pd,
> -                                      struct device *dev)
> -{
> -     int ret;
> -
> -     dev_dbg(dev, "adding to power domain %s\n", pd->pd.name);
> -
> -     while (1) {
> -             ret = pm_genpd_add_device(&pd->pd, dev);
> -             if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> -                     break;
> -             cond_resched();
> -     }
> -
> -     pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(dev, true);
> -}
> -
> -static void exynos_remove_device_from_domain(struct device *dev)
> -{
> -     struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
> -     int ret;
> -
> -     dev_dbg(dev, "removing from power domain %s\n", genpd->name);
> -
> -     while (1) {
> -             ret = pm_genpd_remove_device(genpd, dev);
> -             if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> -                     break;
> -             cond_resched();
> -     }
> -}
> -
> -static void exynos_read_domain_from_dt(struct device *dev)
> -{
> -     struct platform_device *pd_pdev;
> -     struct exynos_pm_domain *pd;
> -     struct device_node *node;
> -
> -     node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "samsung,power-domain", 0);

This removes "samsung,power-domain" phandle handling but I cannot find
in your patch series updates to existing EXYNOS dts files converting
them to use the new "power-domain" property.  Am I missing something?

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

> -     if (!node)
> -             return;
> -     pd_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> -     if (!pd_pdev)
> -             return;
> -     pd = platform_get_drvdata(pd_pdev);
> -     exynos_add_device_to_domain(pd, dev);
> -}
> -
> -static int exynos_pm_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
> -                                 unsigned long event, void *data)
> -{
> -     struct device *dev = data;
> -
> -     switch (event) {
> -     case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
> -             if (dev->of_node)
> -                     exynos_read_domain_from_dt(dev);
> -
> -             break;
> -
> -     case BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER:
> -             exynos_remove_device_from_domain(dev);
> -
> -             break;
> -     }
> -     return NOTIFY_DONE;
> -}
> -
> -static struct notifier_block platform_nb = {
> -     .notifier_call = exynos_pm_notifier_call,
> -};
> -
>  static __init int exynos4_pm_init_power_domain(void)
>  {
>       struct platform_device *pdev;
> @@ -156,8 +84,6 @@ static __init int exynos4_pm_init_power_domain(void)
>               struct exynos_pm_domain *pd;
>               int on;
>  
> -             pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> -
>               pd = kzalloc(sizeof(*pd), GFP_KERNEL);
>               if (!pd) {
>                       pr_err("%s: failed to allocate memory for domain\n",
> @@ -170,17 +96,13 @@ static __init int exynos4_pm_init_power_domain(void)
>               pd->base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>               pd->pd.power_off = exynos_pd_power_off;
>               pd->pd.power_on = exynos_pd_power_on;
> -             pd->pd.of_node = np;
> -
> -             platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pd);
>  
>               on = __raw_readl(pd->base + 0x4) & S5P_INT_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
>  
>               pm_genpd_init(&pd->pd, NULL, !on);
> +             of_genpd_add_provider(np, of_genpd_xlate_simple, &pd->pd);
>       }
>  
> -     bus_register_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &platform_nb);
> -
>       return 0;
>  }
>  arch_initcall(exynos4_pm_init_power_domain);
> diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> index 45aa98e..b17588c 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ config PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_RUNTIME
>  
>  config PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF
>       def_bool y
> -     depends on PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS && OF && !ARCH_EXYNOS
> +     depends on PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS && OF
>  
>  config CPU_PM
>       bool

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to