On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:

> From: Kamil Debski <k.deb...@samsung.com>
> 
> Add the phy provider, supplied by new Exynos-usb2phy using
> Generic phy framework.
> Keeping the support for older USB phy intact right now, in order
> to prevent any functionality break in absence of relevant
> device tree side change for ehci-exynos.
> Once we move to new phy in the device nodes for ehci, we can
> remove the support for older phys.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski <k.deb...@samsung.com>
> [gautam.vi...@samsung.com: Addressed review comments from mailing list]
> [gautam.vi...@samsung.com: Kept the code for old usb-phy, and just
> added support for new exynos5-usb2phy in generic phy framework]
> [gautam.vi...@samsung.com: Edited the commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vi...@samsung.com>

> +static int exynos_ehci_phyg_off(struct phy *phy[])
> +{
> +     int i;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; ret == 0 && i < PHY_NUMBER; i++)
> +             if (phy[i])
> +                     ret = phy_power_off(phy[i]);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}

Same comment as in the OHCI driver about ret.

> @@ -175,6 +269,7 @@ skip_phy:
>  fail_add_hcd:
>       if (exynos_ehci->phy)
>               usb_phy_shutdown(exynos_ehci->phy);
> +     exynos_ehci_phyg_off(exynos_ehci->phy_g);
>  fail_io:
>       clk_disable_unprepare(exynos_ehci->clk);
>  fail_clk:
> @@ -195,6 +290,8 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       if (exynos_ehci->phy)
>               usb_phy_shutdown(exynos_ehci->phy);
>  
> +     exynos_ehci_phyg_off(exynos_ehci->phy_g);
> +

In both these places, you need to test exynos_ehci->phyg before calling 
exynos_ehci_phyg_off().

Maybe it would help to add exynos_ehci_phy_enable/disable routines, 
like in the OHCI driver.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to