Hi Pankaj,
On 25.04.2014 14:32, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
As machine function ops are used only in this file let's make
them static.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.du...@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index b32a907..2388ee4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = {
},
};
-void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
+static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
{
struct device_node *np;
u32 val = 0x1;
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
}
-void __init exynos_init_late(void)
+static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
{
if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
/* to be supported later */
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static void __init exynos_map_io(void)
iotable_init(exynos5250_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_iodesc));
}
-void __init exynos_init_io(void)
+static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
{
debug_ll_io_init();
This patch seems to be irrelevant to the rest of this series. Anyway,
the changes itself are fine, except that I can see more functions that
could be made static as well:
- exynos_cpuidle_init(),
- exynos_cpufreq_init().
In fact, they both could be probably eliminated, as they are just
oneliners doing things that could be done in exynos_dt_machine_init()
directly.
So, if you are doing this kind of cleanup, you could do this as well and
probably also replace platform_device + platform_device_register() with
platform_device_register_simple() for cpuidle, to reduce line count and
make it consistent with cpufreq.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
