On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:17:01AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/28/2014 06:02 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 08:30:32PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > >> Since we now automatically enable early BRESP in core L2C-310 code when > >> we detect a Cortex-A9, we don't need platforms/SoCs to set this bit > >> explicitly. Instead, they should seek to preserve the value of bit 30 > >> in the auxiliary control register. > >> > >> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk> > > > > I would prefer if this patch was broken out into individual patches > > for each board or SoC file and that they were then picked up > > by their respective platform maintainers. > > > > Likewise for patch 66/97. Although it is only for shmobile > > I would prefer it broken out. > > There are far too many dependencies in this series to break out the > board file patches to be merged separately; it'd take either a whole > bunch of kernel releases to merge it all that way, or a twisty maze of > tiny topic branches cross-merged all over the place. Neither option is > realistic.
Understood, that seems reasonable to me. For the shmobile portions this patch and 66/97. Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+rene...@verge.net.au> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
