On Wednesday 14 May 2014 18:44:46 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14 May 2014 18:41, Heiko Stübner <he...@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2014, 18:35:29 schrieb Viresh Kumar:
> >> On 14 May 2014 18:20, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> >> > Could we please come up with a way to probe this from DT in the
> >> > cpufreq-cpu0 driver itself, so we don't have to add a device in every
> >> > platform using it?
>
> >> Its followed that way because DT Maintainers had strong objections
> >> to creating virtual device nodes and haven't allowed creation of nodes
> >> for cpufreq drivers.. For which there is no physical device, as CPU already
> >> has a separate node..
> >
> > as we already have the "enable-method" property for enabling/disabling cpus,
> > would something like a "scaling-method" be feasible?
Good idea to put it as a property into the CPU node.
> Lets see what DT maintainers have to say on this, I would rather go for a
> more straight forward name: "scaling-driver" ..
Both sound fine to me.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
