Hi Abhilash,

On 13.05.2014 12:12, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com> wrote:

[snip]

>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-
>>> pmu.h
>>> index 4f6a256..0bdfcbc 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>>> @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@
>>>
>>>  #define S5P_CHECK_SLEEP                              0x00000BAD
>>>
>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION               S5P_PMUREG(0x2000)
>>
>> This can be put in order of address.
> OK, will fix.
>>
>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr)   \
>>> +                     (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + (0x80 * (_nr)))
>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr)          \
>>> +                     (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)

My patches posted quite a while ago [1] to fix DT CPU topology already
add these, remove S5P_ARM_CORE1* and fix corresponding usage in
hotplug.c and platsmp.c.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/29573

So I think you should rebase on top of them or at least on top of
patches 1 and 2 from that series, as 3 and 4 should be dropped.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to