On 07/22/2014 04:19 PM, YoungJun Cho wrote: (...)
+ ret = gpio_request_one(dsi->te_gpio, GPIOF_IN, "te_gpio");
devm_* APIs..?
+ if (ret) { + dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %d\n", ret); + goto out; + } + + /* + * This TE GPIO IRQ should not be set to IRQ_NOAUTOEN, because panel + * calls drm_panel_init() first then calls mipi_dsi_attach() in probe(). + * It means that te_gpio is invalid when exynos_dsi_enable_irq() is + * called by drm_panel_init() before panel is attached. + */ + ret = request_threaded_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), + exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL, + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "TE", dsi);
why don't we use devm_request_threaded_irq()..? -- Regards, Varka Bhadram. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html