Hi, Doug. Thanks for review.
On 07/30/2014 03:01 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Jaehoon, > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com> wrote: >> Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks. >> (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.) >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com> >> Tested-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.ka...@samsung.com> >> Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih....@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 12 +++++------- >> include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h | 6 ++---- >> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c >> index 1ac227c..4a4f66f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c >> @@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc) >> int gpio_ro = mmc_gpio_get_ro(mmc); >> >> /* Use platform get_ro function, else try on board write protect */ >> - if (slot->quirks & DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT) >> + if (slot->host->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT) > > It doesn't seem like it would be hard to include support for the old > binding (and just print a warning). Then this could land ahead of the > device tree changes. > > Generally I think we're supposed to keep support for old device trees > if possible (except in extreme cases). Ok, I see. I will add the Warning message like this. ("Recommend not to use the slot-node...") Then Developers can change the device-tree, right. Today, i will send the patch. If you have any other comment, let me know, plz. I want to merge this patch-set into 3.16. Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > > -Doug > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html