Hi Andreas,

Sorry for joining the party a bit late, but there were patches with less
people involved so I preferred to review them first.

You can find my comments inline.

On 31.07.2014 18:08, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Adds initial support for the HP Chromebook 11.

[snip]

> +     gpio-keys {
> +             compatible = "gpio-keys";
> +             pinctrl-names = "default";
> +             pinctrl-0 = <&power_key_irq>, <&lid_irq>;
> +
> +             power {
> +                     label = "Power";
> +                     gpios = <&gpx1 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +                     linux,code = <KEY_POWER>;

I assume the key is debounced in hardware, so there is no need for
debounce-interval here. Is this correct?

> +                     gpio-key,wakeup;
> +             };
> +
> +             lid-switch {
> +                     label = "Lid";
> +                     gpios = <&gpx3 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +                     linux,input-type = <5>; /* EV_SW */
> +                     linux,code = <0>; /* SW_LID */
> +                     debounce-interval = <1>;
> +                     gpio-key,wakeup;
> +             };
> +     };
> +
> +     usb3_vbus_reg: regulator-usb3 {
> +             compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +             regulator-name = "P5.0V_USB3CON";
> +             regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> +             regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> +             gpio = <&gpe1 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +             enable-active-high;
> +     };
> +
> +     usb@12110000 {

Since this is a brand new dts file, it should use the reference based
syntax, which would be something like

&usbhost {
        ...
};

below the / { ... }; block.

> +             samsung,vbus-gpio = <&gpx1 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +     };
> +
> +     usb-hub {
> +             compatible = "smsc,usb3503a";
> +             reset-gpios = <&hsic_reset>;

Hmm, why a -gpios property points to a pinctrl node? Shouldn't there be
a phandle to GPIO bank + GPIO specifier instead?

> +     };
> +
> +     fixed-rate-clocks {
> +             xxti {
> +                     compatible = "samsung,clock-xxti";
> +                     clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> +             };
> +     };

This is also referencing a node from higher level, so it should be done
using a reference.

> +
> +     hdmi {
> +             hpd-gpio = <&gpx3 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +             pinctrl-names = "default";
> +             pinctrl-0 = <&hdmi_hpd_irq>;
> +             phy = <&hdmiphy>;
> +             ddc = <&i2c_2>;
> +             hdmi-en-supply = <&s5m_ldo8_reg>;
> +             vdd-supply = <&s5m_ldo8_reg>;
> +             vdd_osc-supply = <&s5m_ldo10_reg>;
> +             vdd_pll-supply = <&s5m_ldo8_reg>;
> +     };

Ditto.

> +
> +     fimd@14400000 {
> +             status = "okay";
> +             samsung,invert-vclk;
> +     };

Ditto.

> +
> +     dp-controller@145B0000 {
> +             status = "okay";
> +             pinctrl-names = "default";
> +             pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>;
> +             samsung,color-space = <0>;
> +             samsung,dynamic-range = <0>;
> +             samsung,ycbcr-coeff = <0>;
> +             samsung,color-depth = <1>;
> +             samsung,link-rate = <0x0a>;
> +             samsung,lane-count = <1>;
> +             samsung,hpd-gpio = <&gpc3 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +     };

Ditto.

> +};
> +
> +&dp_hpd {
> +     samsung,pins = "gpc3-0";
> +     samsung,pin-function = <0>;
> +     samsung,pin-pud = <3>;
> +     samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> +};

Hmm, what node is this referencing? I believe this should rather
reference the pin controller and add a new board-specific pinconf/pinmux
group instead....

> +
> +&i2c_0 {
> +     status = "okay";
> +     samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
> +     samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <378000>;

[snip]

> +/*
> + * Disabled pullups since external part has its own pullups and
> + * double-pulling gets us out of spec in some cases.
> + */
> +&i2c2_bus {
> +     samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
> +};

OK, here overriding a generic pinconf group is justified and nicely
explained by a comment.

> +
> +&i2c_2 {
> +     status = "okay";
> +     samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
> +     samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <66000>;
> +
> +     hdmiddc@50 {
> +             compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-hdmiddc";
> +             reg = <0x50>;
> +     };

I don't think this matches current Exynos HDMI bindings, which I believe
have been changed to just take a phandle to i2c bus instead.

> +};
> +
> +&i2c_3 {
> +     status = "okay";
> +     samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
> +     samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <66000>;
> +};

[snip]

> +&sd1_clk {
> +     samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> +};
> +
> +&sd1_cmd {
> +     samsung,pin-pud = <3>;
> +     samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> +};
> +
> +&sd1_cd {
> +     samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> +};
> +
> +&sd1_bus4 {
> +     samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> +};

Here generic settings are being overridden, so it might be a good idea
to explain why, like with i2c pull-up above.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to