Hi Jingoo,
Am 05.08.2014 13:16, schrieb Jingoo Han:
> On Saturday, August 02, 2014 5:57 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On 01.08.2014 22:54, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 01.08.2014 22:33, schrieb Doug Anderson:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>> Spring uses a different GPIO, so this is not a generic SoC piece.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <t.f...@samsung.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v5: New (Tomasz Figa)
>>>>> Frees dp_hpd for Spring.
>>>>>
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi | 7 -------
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 9 +++++++++
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts | 7 +++++++
>>>>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>>> index 886cfca044ac..ed0e5230514b 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -581,13 +581,6 @@
>>>>> samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
>>>>> samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>>>> };
>>>>> -
>>>>> - dp_hpd: dp_hpd {
>>>>> - samsung,pins = "gpx0-7";
>>>>> - samsung,pin-function = <3>;
>>>>> - samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
>>>>> - samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>>>> - };
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> pinctrl@13400000 {
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>>>> index aaa055ac0fe3..5d30fe1dcda4 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>>>> @@ -414,3 +414,12 @@
>>>>> };
>>>>> };
>>>>> };
>>>>> +
>>>>> +&pinctrl_0 {
>>>>> + dp_hpd: dp_hpd {
>>>>> + samsung,pins = "gpx0-7";
>>>>> + samsung,pin-function = <3>;
>>>>> + samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
>>>>> + samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +};
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>>>>> index c4b0c73c736d..a9a2f2743794 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>>>>> @@ -547,6 +547,13 @@
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> &pinctrl_0 {
>>>>> + dp_hpd: dp_hpd {
>>>>> + samsung,pins = "gpx0-7";
>>>>> + samsung,pin-function = <3>;
>>>>> + samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
>>>>> + samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> NAK. dp_hpd is a generic SoC piece. Pin function 0 and 1 are GPIOs.
>>>> Pin function 3 is special function. This pin _is_ the hot plug detect
>>>> pin for display port. When it's set as special function 3 it goes
>>>> straight into the hot plug logic of the display port controller.
>>>>
>>>> Spring may have had its reasons to detect hot plug events on a GPIO
>>>> instead of using this pin, but that doesn't make this pin any less the
>>>> "hot plug pin".
>>>
>>> Please advise how to handle it then: Should there be two different
>>> pinctrl entries (if so, how should it be named?),
>>
>> IMHO this is the right way. Just name the GPIO variant dp_hpd_gpio.
>
> Hi Andreas Färber,
>
> I agree with Tomasz Figa and Doug Anderson.
> Please refer to the following.
>
> 1. case: Standard HPD pin is used. (smdk5420)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-pinctrl.dts
> pinctrl@13400000 {
> dp_hpd: dp_hpd {
> samsung,pins = "gpx0-7";
> samsung,pin-function = <3>;
> samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
> samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> };
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts
> dp-controller@145B0000 {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>;
> ...
>
> 2. case: non-standard HPD pin such as GPIO is used. (peach pit)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts
> pinctrl@13400000 {
> dp_hpd_gpio: dp_hpd_gpio {
> samsung,pins = "gpx2-6";
> samsung,pin-function = <0>;
> samsung,pin-pud = <3>;
> samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
> };
> dp-controller@145B0000 {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd_gpio>;
> ...
> samsung,hpd-gpio = <&gpx2 6 0>;
>
> So, you need to follow the second case.
> "dp_hpd_gpio" can be used for Spring board.
I believe I already did so in v6 [0]? Please take a look there and let
me know if you still need anything changed. The label name seems
identical, whereas for the node name I adopted the dashes convention.
Thanks,
Andreas
[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4664691/
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
