On 21.08.2015 12:41, Anand Moon wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 21 August 2015 at 06:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com> > wrote: >> On 21.08.2015 03:15, Anand Moon wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On 20 August 2015 at 21:40, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@free.fr> wrote: >>>> On 08/20/2015 12:54 PM, Anand Moon wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello Krzysztof/Kukjim, >>>>> >>>>> CPUIdle seen to be not working for Exynos5422 Odroid boards. >>>>> >>>>> Is their any way this feature will be implemented in the future. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah a good willing to fix the bl1. More than one year asking for that ! >>>> nooo way !! >>>> >>>> Your answer is at the end of >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-June/350632.html >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Thanks for the explanation. >>> >>> I was just referring following the source code. >>> >>> https://github.com/hardkernel/linux/blob/odroidxu3-3.10.y/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle-exynos5422.c >>> >>> It seem that cpufreq and cpuidle go hand in hand. >> >> Bartlomiej was working on cpufreq for Exynos542x: >> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1504.2/03139.html >> >> It would be nice to have also cpuidle and suspend features working on >> Exynos542x family but this depends on firmware. Some time ago I >> struggled with suspend on Arndale Octa (Exynos5420) and I failed. I >> think the firmware is the issue here. >> >> Actually I am not sure what is your question Anand. You are asking if >> someone plans to do this? > > Yes I am asking are their plans to implement cpufreq and cpuidle > simultaneously.
There are no obstacles for implementing them simultaneously so the question is rather who plans to do the cpuidle driver for Exynos542x? I don't... at least in nearby future. If I had some spare time then probably I would try to make suspend working. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html