On 31 August 2015 at 14:25, Inki Dae <inki....@samsung.com> wrote: > On 2015년 08월 24일 23:14, Tobias Jakobi wrote: >> We now validate the blending mode via g2d_validate_mode() >> prior to feeding it to g2d_get_blend_op(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjak...@math.uni-bielefeld.de> >> --- >> exynos/exynos_fimg2d.c | 5 ----- >> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/exynos/exynos_fimg2d.c b/exynos/exynos_fimg2d.c >> index 4274a94..d708e91 100644 >> --- a/exynos/exynos_fimg2d.c >> +++ b/exynos/exynos_fimg2d.c >> @@ -91,11 +91,6 @@ static unsigned int g2d_get_blend_op(enum e_g2d_op op) >> SET_BF(val, G2D_COEFF_MODE_SRC_ALPHA, 0, 0, 0, >> G2D_COEFF_MODE_SRC_ALPHA, 1, 0, 0); >> break; >> - default: >> - fprintf(stderr, "Not support operation(%d).\n", op); >> - SET_BF(val, G2D_COEFF_MODE_ONE, 0, 0, 0, G2D_COEFF_MODE_ZERO, >> - 0, 0, 0); >> - break; > > With this, how about changing above switch and case statement to if > statement? > Out of curiosity: why is if/else statement preferred - won't it make things longer/harder to read (there are 11 cases here) ?
Cheers, Emil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
