On 02.09.2015 09:32, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 09/02/2015 02:15 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 01.09.2015 23:17, Chanho Park wrote: >>> The cpu booting of exynos5422 has been still broken since we discussed >>> it in last year[1]. This patch is inspired from Odroid XU3 >>> code (Actually, it was from samsung exynos vendor kernel)[2]. This weird >>> reset code was founded exynos5420 octa cores series SoCs and only >>> required for the first boot core is the Little core (Cortex A7). >>> Some of the exynos5420 boards and all of the exynos5422 boards will require >>> this code. >>> >>> There is two ways to check the little core is the first cpu. One is >>> checking GPG2CON[1] GPIO value and the other is checking the cluster >>> number of the first cpu. I selected the latter because it's more easier >>> than the former. >>> >>> [1]:http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-June/350632.html >>> [2]:https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6782891/ >>> >>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khil...@kernel.org> >>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com> >>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com> >>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@linaro.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <parkc...@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> Changes from v1: >>> .kfc to Little (Cortex A7) and eagle to big (Cortex A15) >>> .append comments about waiting SPARE2 register >>> >>> Changes since RFC: >>> .drop checking soc_is_exynos5800 to extend this codes to >>> exynos5420/5422 boards. >>> .kfc cores will be reset only if the cpu0 is kfc core. >>> .Rebase top of the kukjin's for-next branch >>> >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 6 ++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Thanks for updating the patch. Remaining minor nit about comment style >> (/* on first line) can be fixed while applying. >> >> The patch works good, after disabling bL switcher I have 8 cores running: >> >> Tested on Odroid XU4: >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com> >> Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com> >> >> It's 4.3 merge window so the patch will go probably to v4.4. >> > > Isn't this material for the v4.3 -rc cycle since it's fixing a bug > (CPUs not booting)? So I don't think that's necessary to wait for v4.4.
It is a bug fix but: 1. Not a fix for regression introduced in current merge window, 2. There may be more subtle issues like the one mentioned below, not found yet (probably no one tested it with all possible configurations), so I don't think rushing with the patch to mainline is good idea. However your comment reminds me about stable. This actually looks like a candidate for stable. > > But I was expecting another re-spin as from Abhilash's latest comments [0], > it seems the same workaround is needed in arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c > to avoid the CPU's not booting issue when CCI is disabled in DT and the > MCPM backend is bypassed. > > Although I guess that could be also made as a follow up patch. Chanho patch fixes only MCPM path. Regular path (platsmp, firmware) is not affected so I would expect a following patch. Best regards, Krzysztof > >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> >> > > [0]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg442399.html > > Best regards, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
