Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic, and this MFD also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which has the same name, which is a bit confusing.
We did discussed different approaches about how the MFD and it cells need to be named here [1]. Based in the discussion this patch rename MFD regulator name as *-regulator instead of current *-pmic. [1]-> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/28/417 Suggested-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akh...@samsung.com> --- drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c index 7c4e7be17f1e..c9802ba9be72 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s5m8767_devs[] = { static const struct mfd_cell s2mps11_devs[] = { { - .name = "s2mps11-pmic", + .name = "s2mps11-regulator", }, { .name = "s2mps14-rtc", }, { @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps11_devs[] = { }; static const struct mfd_cell s2mps13_devs[] = { - { .name = "s2mps13-pmic", }, + { .name = "s2mps13-regulator", }, { .name = "s2mps13-rtc", }, { .name = "s2mps13-clk", @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps13_devs[] = { static const struct mfd_cell s2mps14_devs[] = { { - .name = "s2mps14-pmic", + .name = "s2mps14-regulator", }, { .name = "s2mps14-rtc", }, { @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = { static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = { { - .name = "s2mpu02-pmic", + .name = "s2mpu02-regulator", }, }; -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
