Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I think you misunderstood my point. megaraid does not produce a warning > about a missing return check when I compile it with gcc-3.4. Does it > warn for you? If not, why did you include it in the list?
I grepped the whole source tree and discared the locations where in the very same line the return value got obviousely used for something. I am not sure right now why megaraid got into the list. The listing was meant as a summary information where the described sitatuion might be present as well. I agree, i should have checked the lines in front of the statement for every single location, to avoid any false positives. I didnt do that. -Alex. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
