From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] add bidi support for block pc requests
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:49:37 +0300

> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] add bidi support for block pc requests
> > Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:48:13 +0200
> > 
> >> On Thu, May 17 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>> From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] add bidi support for block pc requests
> >>> Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:53:22 +0200
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, May 16 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >>>>> now there are 2 issues with this:
> >>>>> 1. Even if I do blk_queue_max_phys_segments(q, 127); I still get
> >>>>>    requests for use_sg=128 which will crash the kernel.
> >>>> That sounds like a serious issue, it should definitely not happen. Stuff
> >>>> like that would bite other drivers as well, are you absolutely sure that
> >>>> is happening? Power-of-2 bug in your code, or in the SCSI code?
> >>> Boaz, how do you send requests to the scsi-ml, via fs, sg, or bsg?
> 
> These are regular fs (ext3) requests during bootup. The machine will not
> boot. (Usually from the read ahead code)
> Don't believe me look at the second patch Over Tomo's cleanup.
> If I define SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS to 127 it will crash even when I
> did in code:
>       blk_queue_max_phys_segments(q, SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS);
> I suppose someone is looking at a different definition. Or there is
> another call I need to do for this to work.

ata_scsi_slave_config?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to