On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 02:50:14PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> This solution is still as wrong as it was the last three times it was
> submitted to linux-scsi:
> 
> http://marc.info/?t=117906989600001
> http://marc.info/?t=117926627700012
> http://marc.info/?t=117923062000004

ugh...sorry.  I should have looked first.

> A better, but still not quite right fix is here:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=117995785931981

Yes, I like this a lot better too.
But I'm failing to understanding why "late_initcall" isn't ok. 
I was expecting all drivers to have registered with scsi subsystem
in their module_init() calls and have the scans get kicked off
at that point. Further, I assumed "late_initcall" gets called
after "init" list is processed. What am I missing?

thanks,
grant
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to