On Jan 8, 2008 1:37 PM, Salyzyn, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've always assumed that byte swapping of constants would be optimized where > a variable would not :-)
definitely...I understood that. It just seemed odd usage. > > I have confirmed in assembler output of the compiler that constant > merely become byte reversed constants optimized or no in at least > one architectural case. Thanks! And apologies, I didn't mean to cause you additional work since I was just curious. > I have *not* confirmed that a variable byte reversal requires processing > overhead, as one could possibly expect the compiler to instead optimize by > byte reversing the constant when comparing. However, I will guarantee you > that if optimization is turned off in the compiler that such an optimization > will not take place... :) > > I do not think this turns into a readability issue in either case > and view this as a simple cosmetic coding precaution much > like likely()/unlikely() offers hints to the compiler on code intent... Agreed - it's not a readability issue. thanks, grant > > Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Grant Grundler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 4:17 PM > > To: Salyzyn, Mark > > Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] aacraid: big endian issues > > > > On Jan 8, 2008 12:48 PM, Salyzyn, Mark > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Big endian systems issues discovered in the aacraid driver. > > > > ... > > --- a/drivers/scsi/aacraid/comminit.c 2008-01-08 > > 15:32:28.329810853 -0500 > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/comminit.c 2008-01-08 > > 15:37:35.633163607 -0500 > > @@ -301,10 +301,10 @@ > > if ((!aac_adapter_sync_cmd(dev, GET_ADAPTER_PROPERTIES, > > 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, status+0, status+1, > > status+2, NULL, NULL)) && > > (status[0] == 0x00000001)) { > > - if (status[1] & AAC_OPT_NEW_COMM_64) > > + if (status[1] & le32_to_cpu(AAC_OPT_NEW_COMM_64)) > > ... > > > > Why apply le32_to_cpu() to the constant instead of the variable? > > On systems were le32_to_cpu() is doing something, can gcc or > > preprocessor optimize the constant? > > I've always assumed it could not but that might be wrong. > > > > thanks, > > grant > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
