Mike Christie wrote: > Mark Hounschell wrote: >> Mark Hounschell wrote: >>> Mike Christie wrote: >>>> Mike Christie wrote: >>>>> Mark Hounschell wrote: >>>>>> I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO >>>>>> interface of 2.6.24.2. I have an application that up until 2.6.24 >>>>>> worked fine. The 2.6.23.16 kernel works fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> During reads I get these kernel messages. Writes and other functions >>>>>> _seem_ OK. Actually basic >>>>>> reads are working. Its with large BC reads using an io_vec list that >>>>>> the problem shows up. >>>>>> >>>>> Are you doing SG_IO to the sg device (/dev/sg*) or to the block device >>>>> (/dev/sdX)? >>>> If you are doing SG_IO to the sg device, then I know of one regression >>>> (well not regression exactly, but I fixed a bug but the patch got >>>> partially overwritten by another patch and that caused a new bug). Both >>>> bugs are fixed in 2.6.25-rc2. Could you try that out if you are doing >>>> SG_IO to the sg device. >>>> >>> Yes, I'm using /dev/sg*. And yes again I'll checkout 2.6.25-rc2 ASIC. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Mark >>> - >> >> 2.6.25-rc2 does fix the problem I'm having. I don't suppose there is a >> patch >> lying around for 2.6.24.2?? >> > > I attached a backport of the patch from Tony (added as cc) that is in > 2.6.25-rc2. Could you try it out against 2.6.24.2 just to make sure it > was this patch, then we can send it to stable. >
Sorry it took so long. This does fix my problem. I hope it's not to late for 2.6.24.3 Regards Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
