On 9/10/2012 3:59 PM, Robert Love wrote:
The following series implements a move from using module parameters
as control interfaces to /sys/bus/fcoe based interfaces. A sysfs infrastructure
was added to the kernel a few cycles ago, this series builds on that work.

It moves the create, vn2vn_create, destroy, enable and disable interfaces
from /sys/module/libfcoe/parameters/ to various places under /sys/bus/fcoe/.
These interfaces simply are not module configurations- they are control
interfaces.

A second goal of this series is to change the initialization sequence for
a FCoE device. The result of this series is that interfaces created using
libfcoe.ko interfaces (i.e. fcoe.ko or bnx2fc.ko) will have the following
starting steps-

1) Create/alloc the port
    - Allocate kernel memory and create per-instance sysfs devices
    - No discovery or login

2) Configure the port
    - Change mode, set ddp_min, etc...

3) Start the port
    - Begins discovery and/or login (depending on mode)

4) Destroy the port
    - Logout and free all memory

Robert, Can you please let me now what is the motivation for this change and what problem are we solving with this approach? Is this primarily to allow user to set the mode?

I'm concerned that we will be breaking user space compatibility with this change, as there should be a corresponding fcoemon/fipvlan change along with this, and existing utilities will not work. Also the way we start fcoe will be completely different and the user may need to do the scripting changes, if any.

Thanks,
Bhanu


I'm looking for feedback on using sysfs files as control interfaces that
the user (application) would write interface names to. I modeled this
series off of the bonding sysfs interface, but it was suggested to me that
it might not be a good example. I belive bonding uses two values per-file
a '+' or a '-" to add or delete and then the ifname apended. I am simply
writing the ifname to the ctlr_create or ctlr_destroy.

Series compiled and tested against v3.5. libfcoe.ko compile warning fixed
upstream after v3.5, anyone who compiles this can ignore section mismatch
warning. Also note that a modified fcoemon is needed to use the fcoe system
service against this kernel modification. I'd be happy to provide that
fcoemon code on request.

---

Robert Love (5):
       libfcoe, fcoe: Allow user to set a ctlr's mode
       libfcoe: Create new libfcoe control interfaces
       fcoe: Use new fcoe_sysfs control interface
       bnx2fc: Use new fcoe_sysfs control interface
       libfcoe, fcoe: Remove libfcoe module parameters


  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-fcoe |   51 +++++++
  drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c        |   98 ++++++++-----
  drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c                 |  229 +++++++++++++++---------------
  drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.h                 |    9 +
  drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c            |   24 +++
  drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_sysfs.c           |  139 ++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_transport.c       |  174 ++++-------------------
  include/scsi/fcoe_sysfs.h                |    5 +
  include/scsi/libfcoe.h                   |   20 ++-
  9 files changed, 445 insertions(+), 304 deletions(-)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to