On 11/05/2012 10:57 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/05/12 15:12, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org> writes:
On 11/02/12 22:45, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 12f6fdf..8deb915 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2714,7 +2714,7 @@ static int sd_probe(struct device *dev)
if (!sdkp)
goto out;
- gd = alloc_disk(SD_MINORS);
+ gd = alloc_disk_node(SD_MINORS, dev_to_node(dev));
if (!gd)
goto out_free;
shost->numa_node can be another NUMA node than dev_to_node(dev). Have
you considered using shost->numa_node here ?
It can? How?
E.g. if the LLD allows the user to specify the value of numa_node and
passes that value to scsi_host_alloc_node() (see also
http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/477 for further information).
Just so I'm clear, you're suggesting I use the scsi_device's host
pointer to get to the Scsi_Host, and that *will* be filled in that this
point, right?
As far as I can see the sdev->host pointer is set in scsi_alloc_sdev()
and that happens before sd_probe() is invoked.
yes, struct scsi_device was created before sd, sd is the top layer.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
