On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Placing a WARN_ON there seems to suggest drivers should not return
> -EAGAIN, so I think I'll just add back those dropped code to
> sdev_runtime_suspend as you have suggested like this:
>
> static int sdev_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
> int (*cb)(struct device *) = pm ? pm->runtime_suspend : NULL;
> struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> int ret;
>
> if (sdev->request_queue->dev)
> return sdev_blk_runtime_suspend(sdev, cb);
>
> ret = scsi_dev_type_suspend(dev, cb);
> if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> pm_schedule_suspend(dev, jiffies_to_msecs(
> round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ/10)));
> return ret;
> }
>
> Does this look OK?
Yes.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
