On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 14:26 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:50:54PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > It's making checkpatch unusable on most drivers because it's spewing > > tons of bogus warnings. The problem is the assumption that studly caps > > is always wrong: it isn't if the variables are named after the various > > conventions in the hardware programming guides (which are usually > > written by Microsoft people). > > > > In order to encourage people to use checkpatch, it has to be *useful* it > > can't stray too far into dogmatic things like this that are essentially > > unfixable by most people who submit patches. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <jbottom...@parallels.com> > > Joe, perhaps this could become a strict check?
or maybe exclude drivers/scsi and include/scsi/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
