On 2013/5/30 9:38, Libo Chen wrote:
> On 2013/5/29 23:03, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> On 05/24/2013 11:40 AM, Libo Chen wrote:
>>> we should check kzalloc, avoid to hit oops
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <libo.c...@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/scsi/megaraid.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> instead of checking scmd->device, sdev is more appropriate.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>>> index 846f475..6b623cb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>>> @@ -4161,6 +4161,10 @@ mega_internal_command(adapter_t *adapter, megacmd_t
>>> *mc, mega_passthru *pthru)
>>> memset(scb, 0, sizeof(scb_t));
>>>
>>> sdev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsi_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (sdev) {
>>> + scsi_free_command(GFP_KERNEL, scmd);
>>
>> I think, that a mutex_unlock(&adapter->int_mtx); is also needed
>> Maybe just setting a rval = -ENOMEM and a jump to to some point below?
>>
>> tomash
>
> thanks for catching this.
>
> when kzalloc broken, fist unlock and then return. I will update later.
>
I think we can put kzalloc outside of mutex_lock(&adapter->int_mtx) ?
phase:
mutex_lock kzalloc
kzalloc -> mutex_lock
>
> Libo
>
>>
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> + }
>>> scmd->device = sdev;
>>>
>>> memset(adapter->int_cdb, 0, sizeof(adapter->int_cdb));
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
