> -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Calaby [mailto:julian.cal...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:21 PM > To: Jingoo Han > Cc: Oliver Neukum; James Bottomley; Ali Akcaagac; Jamie Lenehan; > dc3...@twibble.org; James Bottomley; > linux-scsi > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] [SCSI] dc395x: use NULL instead of 0 > > Hi Jingoo, > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:50 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > >> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 12:55 +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > >> > >> > @@ -4183,15 +4183,17 @@ static void check_eeprom(struct NvRamType > >> > *eeprom, unsigned long io_port) > >> > */ > >> > dprintkl(KERN_WARNING, > >> > "EEProm checksum error: using default values and > >> > options.\n"); > >> > - eeprom->sub_vendor_id[0] = (u8)PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEKRAM; > >> > + eeprom->sub_vendor_id[0] = (u8)(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEKRAM & 0xff); > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> if you are fixing these issues please use the proper macros for > >> conversion of endianness. > > > > Then, do you mean the following? :) > > > > - prom->sub_vendor_id[0] = (u8)PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEKRAM; > > + eprom->sub_vendor_id[0] = (u8)(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEKRAM & > > le16_to_cpu(0xff)); > > No. > > The issue is that the driver is doing things like this: > > eeprom->member[0] = (u8)(CONSTANT & 0xff); > eeprom->member[1] = (u8)(CONSTANT >> 8); > > Which is exactly the same as code along the lines of: > > eeprom->member = cpu_to_le16(CONSTANT);
However, when I compile the following, it makes build error. - eeprom->sub_vendor_id[0] = (u8)(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEKRAM & 0xff); - eeprom->sub_vendor_id[1] = (u8)(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEKRAM >> 8); + eeprom->sub_vendor_id = cpu_to_le16(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEKRAM); Best regards, Jingoo Han -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html