On 09/25/2013 07:48 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 09/24/2013 10:51 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 08/29/2013 09:06 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Hi James,
On 08/07/2013 08:43 AM, Ren Mingxin wrote:
Hi, James:
On 07/11/2013 04:35 AM, Ewan Milne wrote:
Looks good. We have been testing this extensively.
Acked-by: Ewan D. Milne<emi...@redhat.com>
Do you think this patchset can be applied? If so, When? Perhaps you
are waiting for someone's feedback?
We've also tested and got the duration could be shortened from 6m26s
to 44s when 'eh_deadline' was set as 1s(the minimum value of
timeout)
and 16M data were written(I/O processing time can be ignored -
0.7s).
As Ewan said, this is efficient to fast failover policy for
redundant
environments.
Thanks,
Ren
Any objections to this patchset?
I have other patchsets pending (eg asynchronous command aborts)
which are based on this one.
So it would be good to have a status here.
Cheers,
Hannes
Any progress on this patchset? Seems to have gone dormant?
Not for the lack of trying on my side ...
So, James, could please give a short statement about the patchset?
Anything missing from my side?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
