On 01/10/2014 03:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote: > On 1/10/14 12:11 AM, vaughan wrote: >> I haven't figure out why it's rejected with "bookmark invalid"(9) >> reason, rather than "command not supported". IMO "bookmark invalid" is >> used when minor protocol conflict such as final flag not set with >> non-write command. However, I haven't find error of this kind in >> report_opcode, so I guess it's not supported on the target. >> > > Is it possible to get a wireshark/tcpdump trace? It does not have to be > during boot. We just need to see what commands are sent and the response > the target is returning. > > I forgot we know some microsoft iscsi target people. We can just email > them with the trace to confirm what is going on with the target. The > trace seems to be easier for them than them interpreting linux kernel logs.
tcp dump attached. Vaughan
iscsi.dump
Description: Binary data
