Hi Christoph,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:12:19PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Looks useful, but why do we have basically two copies of the same
> code for different commands? Looking at them in detail they mostly look
> like copies of scsi_execute/scsi_execute_req_flags and should be switched
> to that.
I've tried to write a patch but unfortunately there are some problems with that.
For example, look at the submit_rtpg() function:
If the blk_execute_rq() function returns an error, the h->sense buffer
is updated.
rq->sense = h->sense; <---------
memset(rq->sense, 0, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE);
rq->sense_len = h->senselen = 0;
err = blk_execute_rq(rq->q, NULL, rq, 1);
if (err == -EIO) {
sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
"%s: rtpg failed with %x\n",
ALUA_DH_NAME, rq->errors);
h->senselen = rq->sense_len; <--------
err = SCSI_DH_IO;
}
If I convert submit_rtpg() to make use of scsi_execute() then I'll not be
able to read the updated sense buffer.
scsi_execute() accepts a pointer to the sense buffer as parameter, but
it does not update its content in case blk_execute_rq() returns an error.
Maurizio Lombardi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
