On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Decrements of reqs are never concurrent with writes of req_vq: before the > decrement reqs will be != 0; after the decrement the virtqueue completion > routine will not use the req_vq so it can be changed by a new request. Thus > they can happen outside the tgt_lock, provided of course we make reqs an > atomic_t. OK, will take above comment in V2. > Otherwise looks good. Thanks for your review. Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html