There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.

Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.

Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
---
 drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
index ff75ef8..542d5c6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
@@ -5826,12 +5826,13 @@ bfa_fcs_lport_get_rport_max_speed(bfa_fcs_lport_t *port)
        bfa_port_speed_t max_speed = 0;
        struct bfa_port_attr_s port_attr;
        bfa_port_speed_t port_speed, rport_speed;
-       bfa_boolean_t trl_enabled = bfa_fcport_is_ratelim(port->fcs->bfa);
+       bfa_boolean_t trl_enabled;
 
 
        if (port == NULL)
                return 0;
 
+       trl_enabled = bfa_fcport_is_ratelim(port->fcs->bfa);
        fcs = port->fcs;
 
        /* Get Physical port's current speed */
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to