On 06/25/14 15:27, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> scsilun_to_int() has an error which prevents it from generating
> correct LUN numbers for 64bit values.
> Also we should remove the misleading comment about portions of
> the LUN being ignored; the initiator should treat the LUN as
> an opaque value.
> And, finally, the example given should use the correct
> prefix (here: extended flat space addressing scheme).

I'm still not enthusiast about the byte reordering by scsilun_to_int()
for extended logical unit addressing. But I can confirm that this patch
passed the test that failed with the previous version of the 64-bit LUN
patch series. So if you want you can add "Tested-by: Bart van Assche
<bvanass...@acm.org>".

Best regards,

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to